ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78667 57120491
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,667 Replies
Darktroop07
offline
Darktroop07
3,592 posts
Shepherd

1! I guess I was first, but I have no excitement :/

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

2

pangtongshu
offline
pangtongshu
9,808 posts
Jester

tres

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

vier

Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Templar

6: Note that some of the posts are in violation of the thread rules.

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

7, how-so would you say?

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

8. You know, I was going to ask a question, but it's pointless, as rule 1 covers it.

Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Templar

9: This anti-spam is a quote and response.

[quote=JACKinbigletters]how-so would you say?[/quote]

Read the rules in the OP.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

10. That anti-spam confused me a lot.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

12. About the chances of a moderator posting before we get to 100?

Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

It's guaranteed to be 100%. We programmed in a beacon that sends out an alert any time moderator is mentioned.

Snag618
offline
Snag618
6,704 posts
Blacksmith

1. Well, I'll never do that again.

JACKinbigletters
offline
JACKinbigletters
9,363 posts
Treasurer

3. He has a fair point.

Patrick2011
online
Patrick2011
12,319 posts
Templar

4: If it weren't for Gantic's post, there would've been a double post.

Darktroop07
offline
Darktroop07
3,592 posts
Shepherd

Sechs. Because it sounds nice XP

Showing 1-15 of 78667