This is completely untrue. CoD 4 and 5 use the same exact graphcis engine.
Yea that is true, They just probably added more colors into the existing engine which made it look like it had a graphical update.
===
the thing that i hated most about Cod 5 was the rifle grenades. those took the fun out of multiplayer. now everyone uses them and it does not help that they are a one hit kill.
had em in COD4 too, you could add them as an attachment to the m16 among other guns.
i sort of agree with joshmosh. im 11 and im more mature than half of the people i played with on XBL. but cod5 is great and hope cod6 lives up to expectations
Have you seen the E3 demo? The guy was using a supressor and a radar-meaning two attachments? And the radar was an awsome addition. No more-"Cr** didn't see him there!"
COD5 Multi-player is so horrible. Half the maps on the game have tanks, and the tanks so horrible. If one team controls all of them, none will spawn for the other team, and it takes what? 2-3 dead on rockets to kill them? Also, the dogs are so horrible, no dog will you ever see jump over 7 feet directly up. And don't think I'm just saying I hate dogs because I can't get them, when I can get them easily with out trying.
I've played with people who were number 18 in the world in Search and Team Deathmatch, and they are no where near as good as those in CoD4
COD5 has Co-Op? And? The Co-Op factor is just worthless, you don't even get achievements for beating the campaign on co-op.
Don't even get me started about Nazi Zombies, talk about the most boring thing ever, I played on every Zombie map and was bored after round 20 on each.
"also heard that you can have multiple attachments on your guns in XBL(unlike in COD4, 1 attachment only...)"
^ What is that supposed to mean? CoD: WaW you can only attach one as well, what does that have to do with anything?