ForumsGamesCombat arms vs. Counter strike

6 3555
moxu
offline
moxu
3 posts
Nomad

i haven't ever played counter strike and i only played combat arms for about 2 seconds which one is better?

  • 6 Replies
Parsat
offline
Parsat
2,180 posts
Blacksmith

Even though I hate it, Counter-Strike is absolutely superior to Combat Arms. Combat Arms is buggy and has rather poor graphics, even if you try to compare it to CS 1.6. Source is the best one over Combat Arms, CS 1.6, and CS Zero.

myself22889
offline
myself22889
2 posts
Nomad

Eh, I prefer Combat Arms. Better game in my opinion.

Armony
offline
Armony
58 posts
Nomad

I just recently tried both, and I have to say I liked Counter-Strike much more than Combat Arms. Sure, it costs a little bit of money to buy CS, but you don't have to deal with people paying money to get a gameplay advantage over you like in Combat Arms.

Gregbyte
offline
Gregbyte
1,053 posts
Nomad

I swear they've made all pay items on Combat Arms no advantage in gameplay-it's just for looks. Counter Strike all the way. That's a skill game.

andynguyen99
offline
andynguyen99
12 posts
Nomad

Now Combat Arms has more graphics, any way Counter Strike is fun, but Combat Arms is a free game that gives you a little above moderate gameplay, but Counter Strike is slowly breaking down, my opinion really.
Theres quite a few FPS games out there, now they are becoming free, paid games (FPS PC GAMES) are less likely bought.
I think Combat Arms For the Graphics now and Counter Strike for skills

KhainStakard
offline
KhainStakard
1 posts
Peasant

Played both and already stick with Counter-Strike Condition Zero, a lil more updated than 1.6 and as simple as it was in that version!

Showing 1-6 of 6