So I played through each of the last Stands and thought that the weapons were pretty, erm, I don't know how to describe it they just seem like they never get quite strong, until the very end and they become ridiculous. Especially in sonny two, my list went like this, first I would use the revolver, then the compound bow, then the hunting rifle for the rest of the game, because with it I was able to instantly kill two zombies at once, and for the first game it was the same thing except the hunting rifle was much more powerful. But then by the end in the first game you get a berret 50. and I actually started to chuckle at how I so easily shot out all of the zombies, and then only soldiers showed up which I just shot in the legs. Then in Last stand to if you go to fort tran you can get an RPG which has a bit longer reload than Hunting rifle and kills anything.
So in short I just don't think Last stand has major balancing issues
How the common intelligence of the internet saddens me so as to see many people like this, not even replying to my idea using full capitalization, and not even expressing a specific ideal.
Yea I think you are right in both cases I played both of them as well and did pretty much the same tactic as you did. I hope that LS3 will be just as the first 2 with new ideas and maybe the ballancing could be just a bit better...
I do agree with you as well. I think that the game itself is interesting and can be heart-thumping at times (esp when your barrier is breaking!) but I've always had an issue with the weapons too. I thought that LS2 is better in terms of ability to search for weapons (in LS2 it's easier) and also in terms of it's structure. In many ways, LS2 was better. With luck, LS3 will come out soon and we'll get to see if there are any corrections made (but knowing ConArtist from how he had fixed Warfare 1944, I'm pretty sure he'd take comments into consideration esp regarding issue like this!).
I do agree with you as well. I think that the game itself is interesting and can be heart-thumping at times (esp when your barrier is breaking!) but I've always had an issue with the weapons too. I thought that LS2 is better in terms of ability to search for weapons (in LS2 it's easier) and also in terms of it's structure. In many ways, LS2 was better. With luck, LS3 will come out soon and we'll get to see if there are any corrections made (but knowing ConArtist from how he had fixed Warfare 1944, I'm pretty sure he'd take comments into consideration esp regarding issue like this!).
I am SO SORRY for the double posting. I think it was because my browser crash. Is there a way for me to delete the offending double post? My sincere apologies again!
