gameplay all the way, never played gun till it was on the 360 and the graphics where AWFUL but the game was awsome, and the demo to Darkest of Days, awful graphics fun game to play
gameplay comes first of cource , i can still play games from 2000 or earlier , they might have sucky graphics but some are still pretty awesome to play. to be honest though when they make sequels they usualy improve graphics a lot more thanh gameplay which can be a little bit annoying
Games with an addicting gameplay is my choice for sure. The best is a combination, great graphics and addicting gameplay but my choice is gameplay for sure
Both matter relly because graphics depend on your seeing sight and the Gameplay and storyline depand on your sales so both of them are just important as each other if you have Average graphics your Ok but the Gameplay and the Storyline matter more. But if one is a let down other pepole will be writeing Sh'it about your game :P
My grandma always said extra seasoning can't hide poor cooking.... take that into graphics vs. gameplay context, and you will get what the gist of this quote is all about.
High graphics and textures does not a good game make.
its gotta be between cuz i cant play war or WWE games on the ps2 or gamecube (find the gaphics bootleg) but stuff like game play and controls makes me wanna buy it (bought re4 on the ps2 and i hate its graphics)
Of course gameplay...i prefer to play the fisrt delta force than the new ones!! =P... graphics don't mean anything...as most here have said the gameplay is what matters and the plot of course!