The big discussion about which game is better COD4 or MW2. Only counting MP no SP
I say COD4 Thing which are better in COD 4 1Death sprays are for noobs. 2Killstreak rewards in mw2 are to overpowered. 3Commanda is gay 4one man army = unlimited noobtube ammo 5a shotgun under another gun/heartbeatsensro, plz keep it realistic 6javelin suicides 7no dedicate server
@Devkon:While you attempt to make a valid argument, and may have a decent thesis upon which it is based, it is more than likely wrong. The speculative nature in which I make these statements is due to the fact that I can make neither heads nor tails of what the bloody hell you're talking about, since you typed your post in complete gibberish.
@Devkon:While you attempt to make a valid argument, and may have a decent thesis upon which it is based, it is more than likely wrong. The speculative nature in which I make these statements is due to the fact that I can make neither heads nor tails of what the bloody hell you're talking about, since you typed your post in complete gibberish.
It is a fair analysis, grammatically challenged but fair nonetheless. You are right that COD4's glitches don't need to be patched, mostly because people have migrated to MW2 and it is true that people that've lagged behind in COD4 say they still play it because they're "ros" that's a highly illogical argument. But that's their way of moralizing not spending $60 on an amazing game with awesome multi-player.
Overall the way you play has a great deal to do with your opinions about the game. Personally, I have gone deathless using the M16 in MW2 (28-0 on Sub Base was favorite), to contradict the "weak-sauce" comment. Unless that comment was to say they lack TRB guns, in that case yes, since only 2 of all the assault rifles are TRB, and only the FAL is Semi-auto.
However, I do agree that the selection of sniper-rifles is highly limited. The Draganuv is available in a couple of campaign missions, yet is absent entirely from multiplayer. Though it is understandable, since there is only one bolt-action sniper. Personally, they make it up to me by way of silencers and IRL awesomeness of the weaponry. In reality, there were only 600 WA2000s made, and at auctions, a WA2K with box can sell up to $80,000. They Chey-Tac M200 Intervention system is, by far, the most lethal in the realm of anti-personel sniping. This is because of it's revolutionary design and the system as a whole being more accurate than any other sniper rifle in the modern military field.
lagged behind in COD4 say they still play it because they're "ros" that's a highly illogical argument.
no you misunderstood what i was saying. im saying that the majority of people that played cod4 got mw2 and played it for a good long time, then the pros realized that the game sucked because of the multitude of reasons, and then the majority of the pros went back to cod4.
But that's their way of moralizing not spending $60 on an amazing game with awesome multi-player.
and when i say that the game is awfull i mean on multiplayer, cause its still a good game on single player and spec ops. but if they didnt fix any of the problems cod4 had and infact made them worse and added more to them then why play the game.
gone deathless using the M16 in MW2 (28-0 on Sub Base was favorite), to contradict the "weak-sauce" comment. Unless that comment was to say they lack TRB guns, in that case yes, since only 2 of all the assault rifles are TRB, and only the FAL is Semi-auto.
when i say its week sauce im saying that the gun is a pussy gun lol. i dont have a problem with any guns in mw2 and cod4 except the stupid three round burst guns. there completly cheep and take no skill to use at all. and not saying that youre not good or anything but im sure if you used a better gun like an AK (im talking about cod4's AK) or an ACR or something youd be even better. those guns are completly over powered compared to the rest of the game and i mean that for both cod4 and MW2.
As far as TRB guns being for noobs and are cheap, the FAMAS definitely is, because it has the lowest damage out of any AR, and the insane fire-rate they gave it makes it a pain in the arse. The M16 does at least have a legitimate amount of damage on it's side before the fire rate. I do often times use the ACR, and it is by far the best weapon in the game, since the SCAR has a ridiculously small clip-size. Other than that I can't really produce a decent argument, since no one has provided in detail the problems which
made them worse and more
in reference to MW2. So as soon as I see some concrete evidence, we'll have a decent discussion.
in reference to MW2. So as soon as I see some concrete evidence, we'll have a decent discussion.
there has been FAR more exploited glitches used in everyday gameing then cod4 has ever had. even though they get patched people still find more. ex: javilin, care package, care package 2, wall glitch in wasteland, and im sure there are way more that i dont know about because i traded it in for MAG.
cod4 may have some "out of map" glitches but you there practically useless to people who use them. there was that ONE and i mean ONE point in time where cod4 had a shit load of hackers but that got fixed.
so bassically mw2 didnt fix any problems that cod4 had, and infact people have found worse and more glitches then cod4.
Here's what happens. When numerous people play a game, some people look to get an edge or cheat the system. If COD4 "has no problems" then no one that cares to notice the problems is playing. The way you are approaching and defining "roblems" is very specific, you're looking at glitches, and it is true there are some hackers that're on MW2, but all they're doing is "rettying up" their names, and yes, when you see someone die who has a name thats "XYBAXYBAXYBAXYBAXYBAXYBAXYBA," it crowds the screen and is flustering, but they usually suck at the game and aren't enhancing their performance.
If you can find something legitimately wrong with the gameplay, instead of whining about glitches, and have a legitimate grievance, this still may be a worthwhile thread.
If you can find something legitimately wrong with the gameplay, instead of whining about glitches, and have a legitimate grievance, this still may be a worthwhile thread.
i jsut listed a whole bunch of the numorous problems that the game has had. im not saying cod4 doesnt have problems im jsut saying it has less. there is the whole host system which is bad in both but worse in cod4.
but overall the guns are also spread apart more evenly and by that i mean everyone uses every gun ive noticed. while in mw2 theres only maybe 2 or 3 guns used in each class of gun. im not talking about the name thing i could care less about that im talking about all the exploits that people have found in ONE game that they promised to fix.
over the years of cod4 exploits where found. you dont seem to realize that that game has been out for a long time and millions of people have played it. in 07 through 09 late 09 that game was on the top five list of most players for a multiplayer game for a console. people have found exploits for it im not going to lie. but they dont even touch the ones that mw2 has produced. a sequel to a good game should have perfected the system and made everything alright. not make things worse
The fact that that "rebuttal" is still complaining about exploits is pure disappointing. I still have yet to hear any relevant problems, aside from the FAMAS. Also, you can't have every type of every gun in a game, if you do that you end up getting a bunch of weapons with the exact same attributes, just being re-skinned. The 2 or 3 in each class you end up seeing are the ones that the players overall deem better. I haven't had this problem that much, aside from some outlier matches where everyone was using ACR, even then there were a couple of people that chose to use the TAR, why, I have no idea, I honestly hate the thing because it's so inaccurate.
perfected the system
Let's get back to reality for a second, perfection is entirely impossible, because even a large team of developers can't work at the speed to produce a game, and test it enough, to compare with numerous hours of millions of players going through their systems. A perfect multiplayer experience is impossible, because the way code reacts with other code often leaves loopholes, these glitches you seem so fond of whining about. A developer can't reproduce EVERY possible instance in a given amount of time. No matter how good the game is, there will STILL be glitches and exploits. So please bring some commentary on the game-play, so there can be a viable debate.
The fact that that "rebuttal" is still complaining about exploits is pure disappointing. I still have yet to hear any relevant problems, aside from the FAMAS. Also, you can't have every type of every gun in a game, if you do that you end up getting a bunch of weapons with the exact same attributes, just being re-skinned. The 2 or 3 in each class you end up seeing are the ones that the players overall deem better. I haven't had this problem that much, aside from some outlier matches where everyone was using ACR, even then there were a couple of people that chose to use the TAR, why, I have no idea, I honestly hate the thing because it's so inaccurate.
you act like you have never been annoyed by the javilin glitch or the care package stuff, i guess if you dont care thats good for you then. im jsut saying that if a game is going to be perfected they should have perfected the issues the first one brought up. not made them worse.
im not saying that it should have been glitch free. theres always glitches, but lets get real. theres far more in mw2 and they are far worse. the game is not all its built up to be and really the infinity ward didnt change anything about it from cod4 to mw2 infact they made it worse.
and also im not saying to have every gun the same but if youre going to have guns in the game that arent used why have them?
Pro Perks More Perks More equipment More camos More attachments More guns More secondarys More map packs Patched glitches Better graphics Titles and emblems More custom classes Custom kill-streaks Accolades Game winning kills No juggernaut Spec ops
cod4 never had a glitch problem though so the fact that mw2 needs to patch there glitches is insane. it shows that its sloppy game development
Custom kill-streaks
not always a good thing. especially the nuke system. if youre going to have a killstreak that ends the game, it should be EXTREMELY hard to get. and its not, its fairly easy to get a nuke so why do they have it.
No juggernaut
pain killer is the same as juggernaut so it doesnt matter. its a problem in both games.
