Forums → Support Forum → Armor Points

interesting consept, but king/queen is as high as it goes

Why should they?
Look at how many people are actually Wood King or above, barely any.
Until that number increases there is really no need to add any new ranks..

Whats higher than king in real life?
It would go past the original idea and even if there was more, you'd have to keep making more. Carefully considering what you are naming it cause it'll probably get passed.

I tinhk he measn like a call of duty prestige. you keep your Ap, but lose your ranks, and start back at serf, second prestidge, and so forth.

Wouldn't that confuse peope and just not work on here?

I think that copying COD would be weak and well hated. Maybe more in-between ranks and a couple more perks would be nice. I'd need some help with the Perks one, though.

They should had made:
Wood Emperor - above 25,000
Iron Emperor - above 30,000
Gold Emperor - above 55,000

I think it's a fair rate.

Yes I like that setup, maybe we could have it added.
I think Ag 3.0 might have an updated scoring system.

Devs are lazy.

Devs are lazy.

I tinhk he measn like a call of duty prestige. you keep your Ap, but lose your ranks, and start back at serf, second prestidge, and so forth.

@Google

Haven't you heard of Emperor?

@Zanto

As said in the past, we'll get higher ranks only when enough people have maxed out the current ones.

------

I am against having a system where people can move back and forth. This isn't a game.

@Knight: Strop is the lowest Gold King, so there are about 20 Gold Kings.

The numbers that have been put forward are higher than twenty.

I would personally go for higher ranks if a few dozen more people reached gold king.

Wood Emperor - above 25,000
Iron Emperor - above 30,000
Gold Emperor - above 55,000