ForumsGamesHalo Vs. MW2

58 8380
destroyer006
offline
destroyer006
84 posts
Nomad

witch one do you think is better and why

  • 58 Replies
ChillzMaster
offline
ChillzMaster
1,434 posts
Nomad

hehehe funny joke look a new Adam Sandler!
oh *wipes laugh tear from eye* halo reach realistic...whats your next joke gears of war becoming the future?


Dude, it is. Vehicles are a part of warfare, however, MW2 has no regularily-available vehicles. unrealistic for MW2. Not all soldiers can run for miles like some soldiers are permitted w/ a certain perk in MW2. In Reach, running is only available as an armor ability, and very limited. realism goes to Reach, unrealism, MW2. Halo reach has shellshock in a method close to battlefield: bad company's frostbite engine. not perfect, but close. MW2 fails at even having the audio slip out after a nearby 'nade pops. MW2 is proven unrealistic 3 times over. 3 strikes, its out.

HALO REACH!!!!!!!!!!
iWazBord
offline
iWazBord
1,912 posts
Nomad

Reach was the exact same as all the other games. The only thing I liked was the Survival mode they really updated from ODST. No I do not know the name of it, and I don't give a ****.

MW2 is better. You don't have to get shot in the nuts 50 times to die, and though it's labeled as a "Casual game", which it is, I still love to see all the small things you earn for doing little things. EX:Longshot.

runeword
offline
runeword
22 posts
Nomad

Guys in armored space suits....yeah halo is definitely more realistic.....

exon1c
offline
exon1c
7 posts
Nomad

Every1 gets screams at MW2 when they die. So I cant see how people think its even remotely fun.

locoace3
offline
locoace3
15,053 posts
Nomad

Every1 gets screams at MW2 when they die. So I cant see how people think its even remotely fun.


no you just generalize and think everyone does i haven't played against an overly screamy kid yet albeit i have played against complainers saying i'm noob for killing them but they just suck
lightcrux
offline
lightcrux
622 posts
Peasant

I prefer Halo over Modern Warfare 2. Both games have great game-play but I like the futuristic tone in halo over the one in MW2.

Holden012
offline
Holden012
1,989 posts
Nomad

Halo ?? *Vomits*

MW2 is awesome ... Halo is too much in the space age.

I think I'm gonna die if I see another Halo VS's thread.

sk8brder246
offline
sk8brder246
740 posts
Nomad

definetely MW2 but halo is still pretty good MW2 is better because i like a game that is fighting people not aliens

brandroid
offline
brandroid
122 posts
Nomad

Blackopps is way better well call of duty

BackFlip
offline
BackFlip
138 posts
Nomad

halo is just more fun and better :P Reach ftw?

paulc
offline
paulc
6 posts
Nomad

Why is Halo and MW2 allways compared the only thing that they share is that they are both first person shooters besides the they are completely diffrent games,they both have there ups and downs. Both of these games are good in there own ways.

shotgun5
offline
shotgun5
45 posts
Nomad

halo is much better as it has the best story halo is just much more fun but they are still both brilliant games

chang
offline
chang
846 posts
Nomad

For one this comparison is stupid, they have nothing in common except for being first person shooters so there's really not a comparison
For two MW2 was a horrible game and the only people who think its good probably spend all of their time noobtubing. Halo 2 was better than MW2.
MW2 has so many problems it is sad. The game itself is pretty much broken by noobtubes, danger close, one man army, and the lack of any balance in the games weaponry. Good luck convincing me that I'm wrong on that because I know that anyone who has any actual knowledge of first person shooters would agree. And if you seriously think MW2 wasn't broken then PLEASE NEVER make a video game in your lifetime

Showing 46-58 of 58