I don't know, I always assumed Bigfoot was a male, and the Bigfoot reports we've seen over the years are all the same Bigfoot. But, maybe not. Maybe there are male and female Bigfoots. Or is the plural of Bigfoot: Bigfeet?
Bigfoot would have to be a guy. Cause the ones weve seen have probably seen were maybe out hunting or foraging or something. He probably has a family of wives and stuff so the ones we see are probably male out getting food
Does it matter? Like someone said earlier, if Bigfoot was real there'd be more than one of them, so there has to be both genders. IF Bigfoot was real...which he's not...
Give me only one example of a hermaphroditic mammal
Humans can be both, but that's a genetic mutation...still could happen to any mammal I suppose.
If Bigfoot was an actual existing species, there would have to be males and females, quite a lot of them. If not, it doesn't exist and so why bothering about it's gender?
bigfoot was not a species guys -.- he was 1 individual. and he was a male.
bigfoot was not a species guys -.- he was 1 individual. and he was a male.
That would mean that it would have to be a single, unique animal that just popped out of nothing and either will die once, or is longevital or even immortal. Duh.. oh, and what's your evidence for it's gender? So far you don't seem to have more than grandma's tales to back it up.
there are loads dude do ur research lol
*facepalm* ...Dude, did you read what I wrote? None of your examples are mammals.
Humans can be both, but that's a genetic mutation...still could happen to any mammal I suppose.
Found a bit (not enough) of information about true hermaphrodicism in humans.. most of them are infertile and their outer sexual organs are not enough developed to allow real coitus. But there seems to be exceptions, so at least there still seems to be a teeny tiny probability of existing for a branch of big north-american hermaphroditic primates..
oh ya... and who said mammals can'tbe hermaphrodites? their is no rule book and life has surprises. but ya their is no bigfoot... just a past species of what humans once were, thats all.
oh ya... and who said mammals can'tbe hermaphrodites? their is no rule book and life has surprises.
Agreed, we can't say this won't happen before we've seen it. But since I don't know of any obligate hermaphroditic mammal species, and since mutations that lead to hermaphroditism are mostly sterile, I would say mammals don't seem to have good predispositions to take that way. That's all I'm saying.
bigfoot would be a species of boys and girls, but there would be VERY few of them because there is so little proof of them and we do not see any decrese of nateral animals or fruits that they would be eating so there must be very few if any.
