ForumsGames[dup] Halo vs. Call of Duty

11 2414
metroid117
offline
metroid117
4 posts
Nomad

Halo vs. Call of Duty,which do you think?

  • 11 Replies
muffinman08
offline
muffinman08
524 posts
Nomad

sorry, i know your kind of new and all but the thread will probably be locked as a duplicate, there is hundreds of cod vs threads and im sure halo was one of the first come up
it just depends if you really want to sift through pages of older threads...

metroid117
offline
metroid117
4 posts
Nomad

Oh well tnx for letting me know.

Gstroy
offline
Gstroy
482 posts
Nomad

COD, faster paced, better balanced, and not as glitchy.

ChillzMaster
offline
ChillzMaster
1,434 posts
Nomad

COD, faster paced, better balanced, and not as glitchy.


Faster paced? Bah. Halo allows the time for skirmishes, not camping and erupting from nowhere to kill and enemy in 2 seconds; a sign of cowardice on the video game battlefield. Better balanced? How can Halo not be balanced?

Everyone has the same choice of starting guns, and aside from the Elite v. Spartan differences, everyone's on the same playing field, excluding past experience and practice.

Glitchy? Not even a legitimate argument towards the game's overall quality. New Vegas was glitchy as HELL, but i still had a blast!

BTW; this is a MAJOR repeated post. Metroid, please, have some originality.

another BTW: NO MORE COD V. HALO.

The two occupy two different shooter niches that appeal to different people. Aside from being FPS', CoD and Halo are two totally different games.

Please... no more of this repeated drivel...

-Chillz
Spectre4
offline
Spectre4
32 posts
Nomad

...
Call of Duty is toooo modern.

Halo isn't just a shooter. If your a nerd like me you care about the universe and the lore. I was fascinated by the Forerunners and who they were, and also the flood.

Any ways Gravemind has something to say to COD fanboys. SUBMIT

Gstroy
offline
Gstroy
482 posts
Nomad

Faster paced? Bah. Halo allows the time for skirmishes, not camping and erupting from nowhere to kill and enemy in 2 seconds; a sign of cowardice on the video game battlefield. Better balanced? How can Halo not be balanced?
You can still have time consuming(Boring IMO) skirmishes in COD, just play SnD or One in the Chamber.
Everyone has the same choice of starting guns, and aside from the Elite v. Spartan differences, everyone's on the same playing field, excluding past experience and practice.
All that says to me is the game is repetitive and you don't get rewarded for doing well.
Glitchy? Not even a legitimate argument towards the game's overall quality. New Vegas was glitchy as HELL, but i still had a blast!
I don't find it fun to have a nice killstreak ruined by a vehicle getting launched across the map and landing on me...
The two occupy two different shooter niches that appeal to different people. Aside from being FPS', CoD and Halo are two totally different games.
This I can agree to.
awhiteguy
offline
awhiteguy
4 posts
Nomad

i like them both. they both have different qulities that make them both amazinlg awesome! but in the end ima half to go with call of duty baby

ChillzMaster
offline
ChillzMaster
1,434 posts
Nomad

I don't find it fun to have a nice killstreak ruined by a vehicle getting launched across the map and landing on me...


but that's the majesty of Halo! the fact that bat**** crazy stuff like that can happen is all part of the Halo experience!

-Chillz
greentrev106
offline
greentrev106
179 posts
Shepherd

halo for sure. It has a better story and better multiplayer.

redx161
offline
redx161
589 posts
Peasant

I think Halo is a better series with the campaign and gameplay, but COD is what most people play and Halo stopped with reach which was a great game but COD will just keep coming

ssjSeybold
offline
ssjSeybold
7 posts
Nomad

I can't choose just one. But if i really had to pick it would have to be old school Halo

Showing 1-11 of 11