Anything that could be fixed possibly?Two great games, a sequel possibly? Warfare 1968? :OThoughts?
A new Warfare ****, game could be nice, 1944 is not the best game, ever. But 1917 is great.
I liked 1917 much better than warfare 1944.If the second was worse the the first, won't the third be worse than them both?
i agree..1917 was fun and easy in a good way...1944 jst made everything complicatedd...i wonder what yeat the sequel might be..we'll jst have to see...
there should definitely be a sequel... can't wait
um aren't those games kinda' old? Why exactly are we talking about them?
1917 was good, they should make one for the Korean war or Vietnam war though
With 'nam we'll have heli-choppers!!! I hope somebody makes it. "Warfare: 'Nam" sounds good :P
The Warfare 1945: USA vs Empire force Japan. This would be reasonable in the wake of to precesor Warfare 1942.
You must be logged in to post a reply!
