ForumsGames[duplicate] MW3 vs. Battlefield 3? (Recommended)

23 7721
LSDrey
offline
LSDrey
2 posts
Nomad

I am aware that MW3 has not yet hit stores, but my question to you is:
"If I were only able to purchase one of these two, which would you recommend?"
-Please provide feedback-

-LSDrey

  • 23 Replies
Highfire
offline
Highfire
3,025 posts
Nomad

I think this is viable for the "CoD? Put it here!" thread -- it's not like Battlefield 3 hasn't been mentioned in it before :P

I would recommend Battlefield 3 for various reasons. You can see my anti-CoD reasons in the thread linked to you earlier in this post. Many a page have my influence and most of them are directly against CoD :P

- H

psychoraven
offline
psychoraven
311 posts
Peasant

Cod is just the same stuff over and over again. Get Battlefield, (or uncharted 3 is even better if you have a ps3)

Dylski11
offline
Dylski11
37 posts
Nomad

It all depends what you like better. If you enjoy playing battlefield and having different types of games. Go battlefield.

If you like playing COD. (If you like MW2 mostly). Get MW3

Simple.

IfYouInsist
offline
IfYouInsist
259 posts
Nomad

MW3 and Batttlefield 3 are two different games. If you want a more realistic firstperson shooter then I would choose Battlefield but if you want more action I would pick MW3.

KrissBoiixP
offline
KrissBoiixP
75 posts
Nomad

ok.. bf3 is new and looks good.. mw3.. just looks like black ops.. nothing new really.. only the story is cool.

dx5231
offline
dx5231
29 posts
Nomad

Mw3 has pretty much the same graphics as mw2, doesn't seem any different from mw2 really, I haven't played it, and only heard some complains about how crappy is the multiplayer mode. Bf3 has some amazing graphics, I haven't played it online, but single player was still sort of fun.

GhostGS
offline
GhostGS
323 posts
Nomad

MW1 is the only one i own, however i have played mw2. if you like shooters that focus on infantry combat and has a more competitive feel to it (hardcore infantrymen). also the structure is allows less team player style combat and more single player.
however, i own bf3 (on ps3 *sigh* stupid brother) and it has improved the structure of how its infantry work. each class has its positive and negatives. and if you like using vehicles, well battlefield certainly gives you a lot of them in some fo the bigger maps. using vehicles is a lot easier as i find that im not crashing in the helicopter anymore compared to bad company 2. also there are a variety of different maps and game types and the majority of the time it all comes down to team work as one team or as a squad.

Ramdanny
offline
Ramdanny
8 posts
Nomad

let me make it simple. MW 3 has better singleplayer and multiplayer modes it also has a good storyline

http://cdn1.gamepro.com/article_img/gamepro/48494-224233-5.jpg?rand=63D3C9C6-A11B-FF9C-4FA1E88E5769BA88

Battlefield 3 has better graphics and a multiplayer with a whole lot of vehicles

http://cdn1.gamepro.com/article_img/gamepro/48490-224233-1.jpg?rand=63D3C9C2-B3A8-DF89-13404926DF7D07D1

stephenking
offline
stephenking
2,413 posts
Nomad

The Battlefield. Jets, leveling buildings, guns, laser sights, explosions. Basically it's my heaven in a nutshell.

Iliketehpie
offline
Iliketehpie
32 posts
Nomad

Battlefield 3 worst graphics ever everything has huge contrast which distracts you from the actually level and the screen constantly blinks all the time I recommend MW3 as it being a much better game.

Rakim
offline
Rakim
143 posts
Treasurer

I din't like MW2 at all and I'm not a big fan of Black Ops either. MW3, however, seems a bit better than those too. I haven't played it but the changes they made seem nice. They didn't make a whole lot of them though. Playing multiplayer in MW2 or BO is very frustrating because of all those idiots who only care about their K/D ratio and will do anything to keep it up. I also hate it that there is no teamwork whatsoever in CoD multiplayer. The single player campaings are also terrible in my opininon.

For those reasons I would say Battlefield 3 is a lot better than MW3. I have played BF3 and I love it. The campaing was a bit disappointing but multiplayer is awesome. There is a lot more teamwork involved and the vehicles are awesome.

I'm not saying that MW3 is terrible (I haven't even tried it) or that everybody should buy BF3 instead. It's just a matter of preferences and it's quite pointless to argue which one is better. They are very differen't afterall.

tomola
offline
tomola
1 posts
Nomad

The Battlefield is more interesting. I recomment to buy a Battlefield.



darbas lietuvoje

GUMMBAAH
offline
GUMMBAAH
43 posts
Nomad

im a hardcore CoD fan so mw3 it is dont care is BF3 is bether .
another reason why i aint buying BF3 is that i dont like vehicles in multiplayer unless its achievable with kill streaks so yeah sorry BF guys im goin for MW3

jl94
offline
jl94
25 posts
Nomad

You can buy mw3 at costco for $53 new

lucianomagno
offline
lucianomagno
10 posts
Nomad

let me tell ya guys that i got myself with my brother the 2 of them and,really,you cant say wich one is better,CoD has a better multiplayer compared to the online only multiplayer of battlefield 3 and has a shorter story(a little sad still),however,BF has better graphics(they blow your mind)and you dont need to have 25 killstreaks to ride a tank,you just ride it,
it all depends on what you do like to play

Showing 1-15 of 23