I see lots of people on AG say it's bad but it's not. Those who have said this probably suck online , A Halo fan or really have'nt played it.
You see I want to know how many people think it's bad. I personally don't think it's bad . All the people who do obviously have'nt played online , special ops or the campaign.
You got to actually try every bit of the game before saying it's bad.
every game no matter what game it is is going to have hackers and moders but mw2s hackers/moders/glitchers are a little more obivous than most games primarly cause there so many
First of all, its nowhere as near popular as it was when it first launched. Second of all, more than half of the online community is just 10-12 year olds that never shut up, making me mute all players before they even do a single thing. N00bt00bs happen all the time, [out of nowhere]. No extra online mode thats a blast to play, like Nazi Zombies was, don't you reply to that with something such as "But we have Special Ops" Special Ops was not that great, short, and honestly was not that fun, boring even. There are 10th Prestige hackers EVERYWHERE, that make fake stats so they can get to the top of the leaderboards, with fake stats like 9999999999999999999999 kills, and like 5 deaths, which now makes getting on the leaderboards nearly impossible, well at least to where people will see your name. Which makes me so made because I love leaderboards, in fact some games I play JUST so I can get on the leaderboards. The campaign was a blast to play but just took me two sittings to beat. I'm sorry but Bad Company 2 is the game for me, sorry Modern Warfare 2. By the way, I was a fanboy of the first game
The makers of Modern Warfare don't get to choose which type of audience plays their games. Also, why should there be more online modes when they have plenty to choose from already?
A gun that requires very little skill to use The only sniper that requires skill is the Intervention the rest you can spray with and get a cheap, lucky kill
You probably like it because you're a n00b with an M16, FAMAS, or any gun that doesn't take skill to use. AKA every assault rifle ,except the F2000, and the UMP
Sort of correct there except for the fact that the UMP does not require skill and your just not that intelligent if you think it does...sorry the truth hurts. Also the RPD, Aug Hbar, All the snipers, except for the Intervention and the Barret .50 as long as you dont spray with it, require no skill, Pretty much all the submachine guns except for the Vector really don't require any skill either. The general point is that there is little to no weapon challenge in the game and its pathetic. There was at least a semi-decent amount of weapon challenge in COD: WAW because there was only the MP40 but with MW2 there is pretty much no weapon challenge because all the guns you can just spray to get kills pretty much. Not to mention thanks to OMA you have unlimited freaking Danger Close super noobtubes in MW2
Instantaneously hitting bullets, no recoil weapons (or if there is any, almost all visual recoil), killstreaks if you are good/lucky, deathstreaks if you are bad, awards for stupid things (longshot), perks, attachments, etc.
Oh, and don't even get me started on how they took away dedis and let hackers run a muck for PC players.
Liked CoD4 a lot, MW2 took all the stupid aspects that were in CoD4 and made them x90000 since they knew it would attract casual gamers while taking away the parts of an actually good FPS to make it easier.
Sort of correct there except for the fact that the UMP does not require skill and your just not that intelligent if you think it does...sorry the truth hurts
Sorry that came out wrong. I meant to say that every assault rifle and the UMP take no skill to use, and the F2000 and possibly the FAL do take skill.
Apparently, since Modern Warfare requires no skill to play, then people with no skill would be playing it. Therefore you should be able to beat those people easily, unless of course you are wrong, or also have no skill.
Apparently, since Modern Warfare requires no skill to play, then people with no skill would be playing it. Therefore you should be able to beat those people easily, unless of course you are wrong, or also have no skill.
It requires no skill to play therefore the people with no skill can easily beat those with skill. So even though I do have skill it makes no difference and also, therefore, the logic in your post is flawed Do not compete with those of superior logic sir and have a nice day.
Sorry that came out wrong. I meant to say that every assault rifle and the UMP take no skill to use, and the F2000 and possibly the FAL do take skill.
Okay well no problem then man And I do agree the FAL can require skill and the F2000 can as well, but other than that lol Oh and pretty much all of the Handguns without Akimbo require skill in my opinion....notice the without Akimbo part though
It requires no skill to play therefore the people with no skill can easily beat those with skill. So even though I do have skill it makes no difference and also, therefore, the logic in your post is flawed Do not compete with those of superior logic sir and have a nice day
Are you mad because the game appeals to the largest possible demographic? I applaud the game makers for thinking of such a bright and original concept!
Are you mad because the game appeals to the largest possible demographic? I applaud the game makers for thinking of such a bright and original concept!
I am mad because the game developers have not been able to find a middle ground as with most games such as BC2 where the skilled players can enjoy the game while the lesser skilled players can enjoy it while getting better at it. Instead with MW2 the lesser skilled players can ruin the experience for the skilled players and never get better at the game, therefore, the game just turns into playground for the 10 year olds with little to no skill while the serious gamers are left wishing they had not spend $60 for something that they cannot really play not want too. Once again your logic is flawed......good day
I applaud the game makers for thinking of such a bright and original concept!
Please tell me you didn't actually mean that. If you did, you live in a box. Basically all ANY of the first person shooters today are is recycled garbage from original ideas. All they do is add shiny new names and graphics to things and there you go! Instant game that is popular amongst people who fall for that type of thing.
I am mad because the game developers have not been able to find a
middle ground as with most games such as BC2 where the skilled players can enjoy the game while the lesser skilled players can enjoy it while getting better at it. Instead with MW2 the lesser skilled players can ruin the experience for the skilled players and never get better at the game, therefore, the game just turns into playground for the 10 year olds with little to no skill while the serious gamers are left wishing they had not spend $60 for something that they cannot really play not want too. Once again your logic is flawed......good day
And that is why BC2 is less popular than MW2! Because BC2 appeals to a smaller demographic! Thank you for proving my point!
And that is why BC2 is less popular than MW2! Because BC2 appeals to a smaller demographic! Thank you for proving my point!
BC2 is less popular....your joking right? Look it up everyone with a brain even the New York Times says and I quote the New York Times, "Bad Company 2 is a better game than MW2" Just because "MW2 sold more" or "It has more players online right now" doesn't make it a better game. It doesn't matter if something popular because lots of people can still hate it. Notice how "opular" Justin Bieber is? Now go look at how many people hate him and his music. I will give you a hint it is a lot of people and I am one of them. Also look at COD: 4, the weapon challenge was much better in it and the developers did succeed in finding a middle ground in that game so skilled and not so skilled players could enjoy it. Now consider that COD: 4 was is considered by many in the intelligent community to be a much better game than MW2 with way less flaws and was extremely popular. Therefore, what you stated previously is highly incorrect in both of those instances and many more I do not wish to describe. Once again sir your logic is completely flawed...just give up (And now I will go to bed knowing that I have crushed your inferior point that you are so terribly attempting to convey)
Notice how "opular" Justin Bieber is? Now go look at how many people hate him and his music
More people like him rather than hate him, which makes it popular. Plus I never said BC2 is a worse game, I just said MW2 is smart for appealing to a larger audience.
I'm sorry that your logic is so flawed that you think mine is flawed.
