What's Wrong With Modern Warfare 2? - Armor Games Community

194	31763

offline

nemo12

723 posts

Nomad

Posted July 15, '10 9:50pm UTC

Nothing is wrong with MW2. All CoD's are excellant.

offline

Holden012

1,989 posts

Nomad

Posted July 16, '10 2:30am UTC

WAW is better , It has the awesome Nazi Zombie mode!

offline

Highfire

3,025 posts

Nomad

Posted July 16, '10 12:23pm UTC

I see lots of people on AG say it's bad but it's not. Those who have said this probably suck online , A Halo fan or really have'nt played it.
You see I want to know how many people think it's bad. I personally don't think it's bad . All the people who do obviously have'nt played online , special ops or the campaign.
You got to actually try every bit of the game before saying it's bad.
So what's your opinion on MW2?
(Only people who have actually played MW2 please)

Oh wow, you really are a dipshit. Not only are you giving bad reasons for how it is good, but you are even trying to shove people to your side by what you're saying. I don't like Halo that much, I just completely hate MW2, simply because:
Unbalanced Weapons (Knife > Sniper, M9-3 Raffica > M4A1)
Retarded Perks (Marathon + Lightweight just allows retarded knifing)
12 Year old kids (or people with the emotional age of one, which seems like you.)
No destructible Ground (Okay I don't mind this too much but other games have it and I would expect a little new stuff in each CoD game)
Vehicles (Even an Xbox game Halo has it, it's bullcrap that they haven't implemeneted any good vehicles in a multiplayer game)
Insanely small maps (a Battlefield outpost in a map is about the size of a full CoD map, which just shows how unbalanced the weapons have to be to be partly playable)

Battlefield is a much better game and so is even Halo, I'm no fan of Halo whatsoever bu I appreciate they actually try to make a good game. I can guarantee that the makers of MW2 cared more for publicity of their game than the actual making of it, it boasts only graphics and that's it, even Battlefield has better graphics and depth than it so it doesn't really count either. They just think that a good game needs a lot of high-tech stuff and publicity, which is essentially what this retarded game is made of.

Battlefield has less depth in terms of technologfy but a much better understanding of a war, destructible ground, classes, teamwork, vehicles and the maps just go to show it.

You are obviously a MW2 "fanboi" and it's incredibly stupid you decide to try and push people into a corner, good luck with being a hypocrite next time mate. Because your game actually does some good - it keeps idiots like you away from better games.

- H

[quote]I see lots of people on AG say it's bad but it's not. Those who have said this probably suck online , A Halo fan or really have'nt played it. \r\nYou see I want to know how many people think it's bad. I personally don't think it's bad . All the people who do obviously have'nt played online , special ops or the campaign. \r\nYou got to actually try every bit of the game before saying it's bad. \r\nSo what's your opinion on MW2? \r\n(Only people who have actually played MW2 please)[/quote]\r\n\r\nOh wow, you really are a dipshit. Not only are you giving bad reasons for how it is good, but you are even trying to shove people to your side by what you're saying. I don't like Halo that much, I just completely hate MW2, simply because:\r\nUnbalanced Weapons (Knife > Sniper, M9-3 Raffica > M4A1)\r\nRetarded Perks (Marathon + Lightweight just allows retarded knifing)\r\n12 Year old kids (or people with the emotional age of one, which seems like you.)\r\nNo destructible Ground (Okay I don't mind this too much but other games have it and I would expect a little new stuff in each CoD game)\r\nVehicles (Even an Xbox game Halo has it, it's bullcrap that they haven't implemeneted any good vehicles in a multiplayer game)\r\nInsanely small maps (a Battlefield outpost in a map is about the size of a full CoD map, which just shows how unbalanced the weapons have to be to be [i]partly[/i] playable)\r\n\r\nBattlefield is a much better game and so is even Halo, I'm no fan of Halo whatsoever bu I appreciate they actually try to make a good game. I can guarantee that the makers of MW2 cared more for publicity of their game than the actual making of it, it boasts only graphics and that's it, even Battlefield has better graphics and depth than it so it doesn't [i]really[/i] count either. They just think that a good game needs a lot of high-tech stuff and publicity, which is essentially what this retarded game is made of. \r\n\r\nBattlefield has less depth in terms of technologfy but a much better understanding of a war, destructible ground, classes, teamwork, vehicles and the maps just go to show it.\r\n\r\nYou are obviously a MW2 "fanboi" and it's incredibly stupid you decide to try and push people into a corner, good luck with being a hypocrite next time mate. Because your game actually does some good - it keeps idiots like you away from better games.\r\n\r\n - H

offline

Gamer_Cale

1,370 posts

Nomad

Posted July 16, '10 12:39pm UTC

Battlefield is a much better game and so is even Halo

Firstly battlefield sucks bullets dip way to much

No destructible Ground

Why does that matter you dont destroy stuff in alot of games

Vehicles (Even an Xbox game Halo has it, it's bullcrap that they haven't implemeneted any good vehicles in a multiplayer game)
Insanely small maps (a Battlefield outpost in a map is about the size of a full CoD map, which just shows how unbalanced the weapons have to be to be partly playable)

the maps are small because they have no vehicles they are made to be a fps they do not need any vehicles and some killstreaks are vehicle like

offline

pauler94

2,513 posts

Nomad

Posted July 16, '10 1:57pm UTC

I'm so tired of people defending MW2. Does it ever get frustrating for you fanboys? Because when I feel like playing some Call of Duty, I go on CoD4 and barely anyone is online, then I go to WaW, and barely anyone is online, so I go on MW2 and I get so angry at the horrific spawn systems and OP weapons that I throw my controller on the ground and I feel like breaking the disc.

offline

WogBoy

60 posts

Nomad

Posted July 16, '10 2:20pm UTC

Me too pauler , exactly the same...! ://

offline

Highfire

3,025 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 7:46am UTC

Firstly battlefield sucks bullets dip way to much

No they don't, I doubt you've had any experiance with firearms really. Check out this link to a sniper rifle on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoDonPRux-I

Bullet drops more than you think.

Why does that matter you dont destroy stuff in alot of games

Depends which game you play. If it's an FPS then I would have to go with Battlefield. And even stranger is I find Battlefield 2 (NOT Battlefield Bad Company 2) more entertaining than CoD4 and MW2.

the maps are small because they have no vehicles they are made to be a fps they do not need any vehicles and some killstreaks are vehicle like

LOL! Battlefield = FPS
Vehicles are in Battlefield
Outposts are in Battlefield
Selected Spawns are in Battlefield
Large Maps are in Battlefield
Balanced Weapons are in Battlefield
Mostly the same for Halo, Halo does it stranger as it hasn't got as large maps but has got an EXCELLENT use of vehicles with it, and the guns are perfectly balanced in my opinion.

So yeah, I'm with pauler, you're a pain in the ass fanboi.

- H

[quote]Firstly battlefield sucks bullets dip way to much [/quote]\r\n\r\nNo they don't, I doubt you've had any experiance with firearms really. Check out this link to a sniper rifle on YouTube:\r\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoDonPRux-I\r\n\r\nBullet drops more than you think.\r\n\r\n[quote]Why does that matter you dont destroy stuff in alot of games [/quote]\r\nDepends which game you play. If it's an FPS then I would have to go with Battlefield. And even stranger is I find Battlefield 2 (NOT Battlefield Bad Company 2) more entertaining than CoD4 and MW2. \r\n\r\n[quote]the maps are small because they have no vehicles they are made to be a fps they do not need any vehicles and some killstreaks are vehicle like[/quote]\r\nLOL! Battlefield = FPS\r\nVehicles are in Battlefield\r\nOutposts are in Battlefield\r\nSelected Spawns are in Battlefield\r\nLarge Maps are in Battlefield\r\nBalanced Weapons are in Battlefield\r\nMostly the same for Halo, Halo does it stranger as it hasn't got as large maps but has got an EXCELLENT use of vehicles with it, and the guns are perfectly balanced in my opinion.\r\n\r\nSo yeah, I'm with pauler, you're a pain in the ass fanboi.\r\n\r\n - H

offline

Holden012

1,989 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 9:02am UTC

Battlefield Bad Company is the best.

@Highfire , I am not a dipshit and I am not a fanboy . I am getting sick of MW2 like how I got sick of Halo , It's nothing great.

I am sick of people on AG saying that kind of stuff just because I liked a game , Doesn't mean I am a fanboy.

I am not defending MW2 anymore , It's just boring now.

Can't you see for the last few pages , I have seen the reason why it sucks and I have stopped defending MW2? Obviously not.

offline

Highfire

3,025 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 4:10pm UTC

Battlefield Bad Company is the best.
@Highfire , I am not a dip**** and I am not a fanboy . I am getting sick of MW2 like how I got sick of Halo , It's nothing great.
I am sick of people on AG saying that kind of stuff just because I liked a game , Doesn't mean I am a fanboy.
I am not defending MW2 anymore , It's just boring now.
Can't you see for the last few pages , I have seen the reason why it sucks and I have stopped defending MW2? Obviously not.

I would usually be unbiased towards an argument of which is better but no. MW2 Sucks and the arguments you used did show u as a dip****, it was a clearly unreasonable and sly tactic to get others to follow you.

- H

offline

factor1

63 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 4:15pm UTC

Gamer_Cale:

Firstly battlefield sucks bullets dip way to much

LOL! Trying to create a sense of realism sure does make a game crap doesn't it?

offline

car203

2 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 9:00pm UTC

there is a lot of hackers in Mordern Warfare 2

offline

RugRat

340 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 9:25pm UTC

ITT: Idiots

offline

Holden012

1,989 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 10:31pm UTC

there is a lot of hackers in Mordern Warfare 2

No shit Sherlock.

We have been whining the last few pages about hackers and how they ruin the game with Aimbot and wall hacks.

Hackers have no life , Hackers and Noobtubers are the things that ruin Modern Warfare 2.

offline

Peek

120 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 11:28pm UTC

The only sniper that requires skill is the Intervention the rest you can spray with and get a cheap, lucky kill

I disagree. The only sniper you can really spray with is the M21. And with that one, you kind of have to spray because it's nearly impossible to get a one-shot kill with the EBR.

If they made the maps bigger, you wouldn't be able to find anyone.

Well... They certainly could've made Rust bigger. Although sometimes on Rust I'll get lucky, because on that map I use SCAR w/ noob tube and RPG, Scavenger Pro, DC, and Ninja Pro; I camp up high in the center and pretty much destroy everyone.

someone who uses the Intervention and quick-scopes and gets hit-markers a lot even though I shoot someone in the chest.

Are you sure you're hitting the chest? Are you using Stopping Power? SP affects sniper rifles differently; on all other guns, it raises the base damage by 1.5. on snipers, it raises the multipliers. Use SP, and a bullet to anywhere except the legs should be a one-shot kill with the Intervention or the Barret. And I've found that pulling the trigger slowly decreases the recoil. Also, as a side note, SP does not affect the WA2000 at all.

[quote]The only sniper that requires skill is the Intervention the rest you can spray with and get a cheap, lucky kill [/quote]\r\n\r\nI disagree. The only sniper you can really spray with is the M21. And with that one, you kind of have to spray because it's nearly impossible to get a one-shot kill with the EBR.\r\n\r\n[quote]If they made the maps bigger, you wouldn't be able to find anyone.[/quote]\r\n\r\nWell... They certainly could've made Rust bigger. Although sometimes on Rust I'll get lucky, because on that map I use SCAR w/ noob tube and RPG, Scavenger Pro, DC, and Ninja Pro; I camp up high in the center and pretty much destroy everyone.\r\n\r\n[quote]someone who uses the Intervention and quick-scopes and gets hit-markers a lot even though I shoot someone in the chest.[/quote]\r\n\r\nAre you sure you're hitting the chest? Are you using Stopping Power? SP affects sniper rifles differently; on all other guns, it raises the base damage by 1.5. on snipers, it raises the multipliers. Use SP, and a bullet to anywhere except the legs should be a one-shot kill with the Intervention or the Barret. And I've found that pulling the trigger slowly decreases the recoil. Also, as a side note, SP does not affect the WA2000 at all.

offline

TRUdog

1,031 posts

Nomad

Posted July 17, '10 11:36pm UTC

And with that one, you kind of have to spray because it's nearly impossible to get a one-shot kill with the EBR.

Totally untrue. People who are actually experienced with the gun can get one shot kills. But I agree that they are hard to get without stopping power.

I use SCAR w/ noob tube and RPG, Scavenger Pro, DC, and Ninja Pro; I camp up high in the center and pretty much destroy everyone.

These are the kind of players that ruin Modern Warfare for us.

Categories

Quests

Community

Forums → Games → What's Wrong With Modern Warfare 2?