ForumsGamesM16 vs. AK-47 (explain which one is better)

349 77955
sk8brder246
offline
sk8brder246
740 posts
Nomad

they are both in every modern era shooter game so which is better

  • 349 Replies
locoace3
offline
locoace3
15,053 posts
Nomad

you also have to remember that the 5.56 is going a lot faster than the 7.62 AK-47 bullet


that just means it'll have more penetration, the bigger bullet will cause the bigger hole.
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

AK-47 is a great gun, but M-16 beats it.

SNIPERx13x
offline
SNIPERx13x
100 posts
Nomad

depends of the game.. i call of duty 6 ak47 its a stupid weapon and in call of duty 7 is one of the best

sk8brder246
offline
sk8brder246
740 posts
Nomad

AK-47 > M16
Auto > Burst.
End.


just becuase the AK has full auto that means it sprays and is not as accurate. the M16 is very accurate and the burst fire is far more effective than the full auto. full auto isnt even meant to kill people more effectively it is designed for suppressing the enemy and keeping them pinned down
GabeValentine
offline
GabeValentine
33 posts
Nomad

I assume we're talking about in video games, right? 'Cause if we're talking real life the AK-47 is the superior weapon. The only reason the M-16 was invented in the first place is because the U.S. didn't want to use a gun invented by the Communists. AK-47 has a cleaner/simpler design, jams less, works better than the M-16 in poor conditions, has less misfires, etc. The list could continue on.

In video games, the M-16 is often powered-up to be on par with other guns, just as some are powered down so that it is more fair to all players. Really, if you're asking if one is better than the other in a game, the answer is that the game makers made them about as close to the same as they could.

PurEvil
offline
PurEvil
409 posts
Nomad

I agree, in real life AK 47 all the way, can't beat the ole Kalashnikov man! You can pretty much do anything with it, drag it to mud water and sand and it most probably still works fine... but the burst on the M16 is of course a great advantage, cause I really like burst-fire weapons in shooters.

Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

Almost everybody on here has fallen prey to the myth that M16/AR-15s jam.

If the M16 series is treated correctly, then it will never, ever jam. Unless your in a very poor enviroment (Iraq, for example), and don't clean your gun as often as you should (about once/twice a week), then your gun WILL jam.

Here is my comprehensive review of the Guns IN REAL LIFE.

Caliber:
M16: 5.56mm
A smaller round, and is shaped similar to a needle. This gives it the advantage of being able to fly further, faster, and with more accuracy. However, being a smaller round, it has less propellant to project it, meaning it has less stopping power. Its pretty common to hit a guy a few times before he stays down. (From my Uncle, Marine)

AK-47: 7.62mm
A larger round, meaning it has more stopping power. Its nose is rounded more, so its a slower, less accurate bullet. Packs more of a puch, if you can hit the target. But if it hits you, you aint getting up.

Mechanisms:
M16:
Relatively complex. A lot of parts, which means thats a lot of parts that can get broken. However, if properly maintained, then you shouldn't experience any problems. If anything, most cases of 'Jams' in Iraq/Afghanistan have actually resulted from the barrel partially melting, then hardening, and interrupting the ejection of brass.

AK-47:
A simple design, though considering its WWII tech, what do you expect? Works to the AK's advantage, though. Cleanup is a breeze. Litteraly soaking it in water for a few minutes is all you really have to do, besides oiling the parts occasionally. You can put the gun through hell, and it'll come back in one peace.

Accuracy/Recoil:
M16:
The gun easily surpasses the AK in all aspects. It fires a round that slices in the air, and coupled with the fact that the M16 is capable of Single Shot/3 Round Burst/Full Auto, its versatile as well. And because nothing scares the crap out of you better than Amerians screaming 'BOOM! HEADSHOT!'

AK-47:
Though it looses out to the M16, it still is respectable. The round it fires is larger, though more sluggish, and at longer ranges has the tendency to 'wobble' in the air. The gun basically sacrifices accuracy for power.

Fear Factor:
M16:
About average. As I said before, the gun is really accurate. And theres something freaky about all your friends' heads kersploding at 400 yards. The gun doesn't look that intimidating, and it sounds almost friendly, if it weren't for the hot lead coming out the business end.

AK47:
This gun is scary. It looks scary, it sounds scary, and most people admire it from the ground with a hole in their chest. A considerable amount of this fear, though, comes from the Coldwar: Hordes of Commies with this iconic gun rampaging across Europe.

***Most of this information comes from several sources:

-Family: Several members of my family have been in the armed forces and have used the M16, or own the AR series or the AK series.

-Personal: I've shot both guns, and researched both, and have manuals on how to build the guns, so if that doesn't make me somewhat qualified, well...

-Books, etc: TV shows on the Military Channel, and books by soilders who have used the guns. Pretty good reading/watching.

Microe
offline
Microe
842 posts
Nomad

Thanks maverick for the detail, I love it.

GabeValentine
offline
GabeValentine
33 posts
Nomad

@Maverick4, great detailed post. I love it. But you didn't pick one over the other. Do you have a personal preference?

If the M16 series is treated correctly, then it will never, ever jam. Unless your in a very poor enviroment (Iraq, for example), and don't clean your gun as often as you should (about once/twice a week), then your gun WILL jam.


Its not that I said the M-16 jams a lot, and true, it will almost never jam if you take enough care. But that can be said of any gun. The argument is that if you put the M-16 and the AK-47 through the same conditions, the AK will jam far less often than the M-16.

As an example, lets say we are in the desert - winds are high, and sand is getting in the gun. You can't clean the gun while in the field, so you'll just have to fight as is. The AK-47 will jam less simply because of its simpler design. Sand can pass right through the gun without getting caught anywhere, and that simply isn't true of the M-16, which will jam up more often.
sk8brder246
offline
sk8brder246
740 posts
Nomad

you also have to realize that the M16 has came a long way since it first came out in the early 60's the M16A1 was really terrible but the newer model which are in most games (with a few exceptions) is far better than the early models

Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

M16A1 is the most hated piece of equipment ever issued by the US. Ever.

I prefer the M16 over the AK-47. I prefer to take out guys before they can get close enough to harm me, and the M16's burst and accuracy is perfect for this. In MW2, I have a class that has thermal on the M16, and I rock with it. Thermal on the FN FAL is pretty good too.

Microe
offline
Microe
842 posts
Nomad

I like the Ak 47 because it looks mean and it fits me and my personality well.

sk8brder246
offline
sk8brder246
740 posts
Nomad

the AK definetly does have an attitude to its look

AndyDGS
offline
AndyDGS
91 posts
Nomad

I prefer AK, but this gun is really getting old
though it's techincal features are awesome

GabeValentine
offline
GabeValentine
33 posts
Nomad

the AK definetly does have an attitude to its look

Well, someone earlier did bring up the fact that we only think so because of the weapon's history. If it had been that the M-16 was used throughout history instead of the AK-47, I believe that we would think it had more attitude or a bigger fear factor.

So I don't think the gun itself has attitude, we just perceive it that way.
Showing 106-120 of 349