ForumsGamesNintendo, why do you think is lame?

62 10646
pabloide
offline
pabloide
7 posts
Nomad

Nintendo is a good company of games, and it has awesome games, but, why people dosnt follow it? because the graphics and the animations!

  • 62 Replies
happyjoe
offline
happyjoe
8 posts
Nomad

@partydevil
not all the wii games require you to be active I play most of the wii games I have sitting down most of the motion controls just involve shaking the remote or tilting the remote. and it can play gamecube games.

I love nintendo the gamecube might not have had the best game but when they did have a good gam it was not just good it was epic just look at metroid prime 1 and 2, (3 was on the wii) super mario sunshine, the legend of zelda that came out on the gamecube they where all epic. the wii had a slow start but when it did got going it got some pretty good games.

go nintendo!

F8crusader
offline
F8crusader
8 posts
Farmer

Nintendo is the only real gaming company. Microsoft is computers and sony is tvs and stuff like that.

Dref14
offline
Dref14
366 posts
Nomad

Honestly i think im going ot be one of the only people here that actually speaks against them, they i believe they took a turn for a worse. 1. The person who wrote the long thing last page said something about a new cod every year, and how SS took 5. well about that, isnt that the rate that they have been pushing out a new DS? and the new system is made to go with the other current gen ( which the wii is in a sense, but im talking about the power and capability) systems. Thats ok but i really dont think its going to appeal to the "hardcore" ( crap term but still) gamers. the Controller is worse than the old xbox, and all thats pushing it is media, the substance is with gameplay, not the gadget. They almost prove that, people like ssbb, it doesnt use its motion control. the only good games that do sure as hell dont use any thing more than motion controls, i mean the stuff they want you to buy is insane. gun for this game, pad for this, wheel for that. The problem isnt the quality but rather the pain you have to get to the quality in the wiis case. i have ps3 and a wii, and i consider my wii to be a shiny GC. thats really what i like it for, the older games that you by online, i have 2 wii games. ( TP is lots better on the GC imho) My ps3 just seems to offer more adversity in its games, and instead of ranting on ill wait for others.

ChillzMaster
offline
ChillzMaster
1,434 posts
Nomad

The person who wrote the long thing last page said something about a new cod every year, and how SS took 5. well about that, isnt that the rate that they have been pushing out a new DS?


Well hello there, my name is ChillzMaster, or as I preferred to be called, The Chillz Master, Armorgames.com's Friendly Neighborhood Satanist Game Sage.

You also mentioned something about you being the only person who speaks out against Nintendo. You'll notice that my post was quite ambiguous about the subject of Nintendo's quality. Oh, and in response to your DS point;

DS - 2004
DS Lite - 2006
DSi - 2009
3DS - 2011

So yea, a lot of models, but not 1 per year. It's kinda like Capcom and their fighting games, just a newer and cheaper model every 20 odd months.

They almost prove that, people like ssbb, it doesnt use its motion control. the only good games that do sure as hell dont use any thing more than motion controls


SSBB I believe is preferably played with a GameCube controller actually. You missed a huge opportunity there. Oh, and the five best games for Wii, Super Mario Galaxy, MadWorld, Red Steel 2, TLOZ: Twilight Princess, and TLOZ: Skyward Sword, are all pretty heavy with their motion controls. This proves that when motion controls are fine-tuned and used to a proper means, they can create absolutely incredible experiences.

I mean, Skyrim is an absolute juggernaut when it comes to games this year, squashing everything it comes across, from Portal 2 to Uncharted 3 to Crysis 2 to Deus Ex, but not Skyward Sword, a "motion-control" game. This motion control game is the only thing that stands a chance at grabbing GOTY awards out from under Skyrim's feet, something no other game released this year can attest to.

gun for this game, pad for this, wheel for that


You obviously haven't been around with Nintendo for too long then. Watch this and you'll start to understand the... "innovative" history of Nintendo hardware.

The problem isnt the quality but rather the pain you have to get to the quality in the wiis case


Out of the best games for Wii, only Red Steel 2 and Skyward Sword require that new "Wii Motion +" add-on from 2009, everything else just needs a Wii-mote and a Nunchuck. All the other extra crap is just crazy marketing ploys, you don't ACTUALLY need them to have a good time. That is indeed another little evil note on Nintendo's part (SENSE THE AMBIGUITY!)

My ps3 just seems to offer more adversity in its games, and instead of ranting on ill wait for others.


Again, this goes back to the 3rd party support I discussed in my original post, the more developers you have sticking their hands into a console, the more ideas you'll get. The PS3 has Uncharted, Infamous, two flavors of Halo-wannabe, LittleBigPlanet, Assassin's Creed, Dead Space, DC Universe Online, R.U.S.E., and that's just scratching the surface. All are developed by different teams, with different ideas and innovative strategies.

Nowadays, just as one company, Nintendo does a great job at diversifying what they do. They have an FPS (Metroid), a 3rd-person Action-Adventure (Zelda), a Final Fantasy-esque party-building RPG (Pokemon), a few flavors of platformers with different unique twists (Kirby, DK, Mario), and a fighting game crossover a la Marvel v Capcom (Super Smash Bros.). As one dev, this is some extreme talent, but it just can't match up to the legions of Bioware's, Bethesda's, and Blizzard's out there.

-Chillz
Dref14
offline
Dref14
366 posts
Nomad

Well im going to start off with final fantasy being compared to pokemon. insulting.

Now back to the other, one of your top 5 is actually a GC game. TP was made and developed for the GC, and then crossed over to the wii. i think it plays better on the GC, camera can be a b otherwise. Platforming nintendo produces kirby, which i deeply enjoy. i wont place it worse than the lbp series, but not better due to map making. going back some years mega man x was the star. i think it was undersold, mario didnt hace much on x and zero. with your fighting games we see them starting to fail. you have 1 ( slightly better than GC graphics but all in all i consider it a GC game) while you say MvC, i may say Soul Caliber and someone else may say Mortal combat and or king of fighters. it just cant defend for itself.

Dref14
offline
Dref14
366 posts
Nomad

Got cut off

skyward sword may be good, so are the others, but thats hardly their focus imo. they put more money into games like wii sports and in the end they get more out of it. I have a hard time defending it when i wait so long for something ( not to be confused with ever year, only MM pulled that off, MMx6 did not) when i can get other games like it on other systems. im done on that note, wii u is still crap, ds is any less obnoxious, profits aside the other 2 are better. nintendo is specialty, its not making new characters you can care for. you brought up dead space 2, Isaac is new. Ezio is new. Drake is new. even Master cheif is newer than Nintendo. this causes several problems, but any how dont take me not saying your name as an insult. your not my focus.

Loptice
offline
Loptice
242 posts
Peasant

wii u is still crap

Yeah and how the heck do you know that? It's not like Wii U has been released.
ForTheCity
offline
ForTheCity
47 posts
Nomad

super nintendo is still the shiznit but too bad i don't have one anymore.

weter506
offline
weter506
159 posts
Nomad

The consoles Nintendo has a excellent controllability and makes games, mostly for younger people can play . But people only think of the graphics and violent games.

Nintendo is not a lame, just make games with bad graphics and suitable for children, while the other platforms of the seventh generation sold in most games, shooting games, fighting games or games that contains violence.

webfeet546
offline
webfeet546
10 posts
Nomad

@weter506: u are right on

Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,546 posts
Jester

just make games with bad graphics


There's a difference between good graphics, bad graphics, and horribly overdone graphics that lag.

And yes, the games Nintendo produces are aimed to be suitable for all audiences, which means less blood/violence on average.
Scouttydog
offline
Scouttydog
56 posts
Nomad

bad graphics, bad playability, small buttons, glitches, breaks ,fragile screen, is it me or do pens need constant replacing?

espadaxin2
offline
espadaxin2
485 posts
Blacksmith

by the way, if you want interactivity, get kinect. is better.

Loptice
offline
Loptice
242 posts
Peasant

Yeah Kinect may be better for some sports games, BUT having no controler is unnatural for most time and some games just desperatly need at least two buttons. Honestly I've seen Fable and it turned ****ty for Xbox. Also have fun playing Halo 4 for Kinect way to kill whole series.

pickpocket
offline
pickpocket
5,952 posts
Shepherd

It isn't lame at all. It's just geared toward younger gamers more than us. I grew up playing only neintendo. It's still pretty awesome

Showing 16-30 of 62