ur under the impression am into that trivial crap, wat i was referring to was the constant barrage of mario and sonic games, wich are mor 15 years old, i mean come on giv it a rest nintendo
SONIC ISN'T NINTENDO YOU UNINFORMED SIMPLETON.
#1 Bad Graphics.
Graphics have no sway in how good a game is. I recently had some of the most fun in a game ever playing Super Mario Party 2 on the N64, where everything was A RECTANGLE.
#2 Sequels are just an expansion with 1 new thing all the time.
There's a difference between what games like Gears of War and Call of Duty do and what Nintendo and Halo games do. Gears and Call of Duty use this technique you speak of, a sequel that can be seen as an expansion pack with one new thing (MW3-Survival; Gears 3-Horde was "revamped"
.
Nintendo and Halo have more of a "Bag of Tricks" method to their games, they have key elements of their games that work, then fill in the rest with really cool new gameplay features and elements that make the overall product better. The Legend of Zelda series is an excellent example of this.
#3 They make good games look bad example COD.
This is an example more suited for a pro-Nintendo guy, but whatever, I'll run with it and insult your grammar. Zelda, Pokemon, Metroid (save Other M), and Mario are all such pure classics and, when released, are some of the best first-party games out there, that yes, they make mediocre shooters like Call of Duty, Homefront, Gears of War, and Medal of Honor 2010 look like absolute fecalmatter.
#4 they got Monster Hunter Tri exclusively.
That's just a clever business move. And what's wrong with exclusivity exactly?
#5 too many products are rushed.
You know I can't make you seem like a dunderhead unless you actually give some examples in your insolent accusations. Otherwise you're just doing my job for me.
PS: also take into consideration does any one brag about their WII now a-days all people talk about is PS3 & XBOX360 In gaming quality and Graphics they beat Nintendo.
This is true. Skyrim doesn't come out on the Wii, nor does any of the other four GOTY nominees, Portal 2, Uncharted 3, Arkham City, Skyward Swo- wait. Nope.
Look, I've already said Graphics are just a good coat of paint. A Bike can be as shiny as possible but it's only as good as the ride, not the looks. Your there to play the excellent gameplay and indulge in the story, not look at graphics (however if a game can deliver on both gameplay and graphics a la Crysis than hallelujah to them).
Back to Zelda. There really are only two possible Game of the Years for 2011, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, a game only for those modern consoles you lavish over, and The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, a game only for the Wii and uses the motion controls of the Wii to the best of its abilities. I've played both and I can tell you, it's a hard pick for me to decide which is better.
You have some legitimacy to your points, Graphics the PS3 and 360 have the Wii beat, but that's like saying that your toes are a different shape of semi-ellipses than mine. Gameplay wise, yeah, the 360 and PS3 get a consistent flow of C+ to A+ games, but the Wii's first party titles are always (save Other M) A+. Galaxy, Epic Yarn, Skyward Sword, if it has a Nintendo First Party brand on it, then it's a guaranteed Diamond (again, SAVE OTHER M).
there is no originality in that console
PS3: In 2006... PS2 IN HD! And Free Online!
360: In 2005... Xbox in HD! And $5 per month Online! And Teh Haloz!
Wii: In 2006... A console based purely around motion controls! And Teh Zeldaz!
Originality? Goes to Wii. Doesn't carry much weight, but please, know what you're talking about.
Every game series that is successful gets recycled. What CoD number are we on now...7? What about Halo...6?
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is the EIGHTH game in the series (removing spin-offs)
Halo 4 will be the FIFTH mainstream Halo game (Reach included, ODST and Wars excluded)
Now, do tell, if you say that "Every game series that is successful gets recycled", then how do you explain Skyrim, Zelda, Battlefield, Total War, or Warcraft, who went from RTS to MMO?
ur under the impression am into that trivial crap,
Back to this bit, why the devil are you inferring that two of the most influential games in Video Game History are trivial? Halo Combat Evolved changed the First-Person Shooter
forever and put console FPS' on the map. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare changed the way FPS mechanics have worked for FOUR YEARS now.
Trivial? Far From it.
Just so you guys understand where I'm coming from, I'm a mainly 360 gamer with an appreciation for both the Wii and the PS3. If I'm not playing teh Haloz or teh Catherinez then I'm on my PC playing indie games or Total War. The only Wii games I have ever gotten into are Super Mario Galaxy and, currently, The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword. This paragraph is necessary because if history tells us anything, it's that anybody who defends Nintendo will be called a Nintendo fanboy. I am far from that, and just want to outline where I'm at in terms of my Games.
-Chillz is also known as a Connoisseur of Video Games... just to add in