Battlefield: Bad Company 2: I love the gameplay, action, graphics, and sound effects. It has some faults, but overall its nice.
--------- COD: MW2: To me, all of the Call of Duty games are the same. (Online)- you level, gain weapons, etc. I just don't like the game. Except Nazi Zombies. <3. The campaign on it is awesome, just the Multiplayer.
Battlefield : Bad Company 2 has a great storyline and multiplayer is fun plus you get to hop into vehicles at any time which is all the more like a real war
------ COD : MW2 is alright but on the PC gets gltiches all the time the storyling is great but is much more realistic than the other so truely its up to you but for me its BFBC2 all the way
Flag I LOVE this game. Why i love this game is because of the realisticness of it all. The recoil,jumping,falling, swimming, dieing, reloading, scoping,iron sights,trees,sky,ect.The game is pure genius!This game is so huge! It took me on the smallest map 4 minutes to cross it on foot, and the largest 8 minutes! Another thing, the vehicles, so many.... so much fun! You might be thinking to your self "Well i really am in no mood for land, so i will take a water scooter. Then i will have a buddy hoop on and sneak attack from behind there base though the water canal!". Wepions, were do i start...really no flaw to them. there just so perfect. So who ever does not have this game, I fell so sorry for you.
I played Battlefield: Bad Company 1 and it was amazing. You have to imagine, there's a tank outside, you reload your rpg, you hear a big boom and the wall behind you doesn't exist anymore. The 2nd part is even better, improved graphics and stuff. Also BC 1 & 2 use the Frostbite engine, which does really nice stuff with the audio, it makes you fell like you're in a battlefield.
COD:MW1 was a good game to me. I completed it in a long time, because i had to do lots of stuff, but the gameplay was good. Unfortunately i could use the good graphics because i played it on a bad machine. But i don't want to say that there's no fun, it's simply something different. The multiplayer sucked alot. COD:MW2 is actually COD:MW1 with other map (and maybe characters, never played it, but saw loads of vids)
I recommend Battlefield: Bad Company 2 because overall, the effect, details and realism it delivers give a very good feeling, and keeps the action up.
You have to imagine, there's a tank outside, you reload your rpg, you hear a big boom and the wall behind you doesn't exist anymore.
lol Yeah man, I was crouching behind a fence from a BMP and it's machinegun was chopping it up. I was crouching back back back! And the fences breaking were catching up to me! I couldn't feel my legs in real life because of the adrenline rush rofl! It's a much better game than MW2, more things are taken into account and to be honest, the only reason that MW2 can compete with BFBC2 is because of it's popularity (between little annoying kids, mostly).
I also love it where I can make my own entrances, usually find someone up the staircase making sure no1 gets through, I throw a C4 behind him and then a C4 at the bottom of the staircase (you can sometimes see a small square window there), I blow it and move in!
Balancing of weapons is much better as M9-3 isn't > M4A1 or a knife isn't > Sniper (noscoping is awesome on this game).
Thats basically it,MW2 has amazing SP but very bad MP and BC2 has bad SP but fun MP.
Hehe, I wouldn't say BFBC2 has bad Campaign, just not as good.
The only thing I did not like about it was that the enemies were blind: *SPOILER*
When you use the thunder to cover your shots you can see the enemy's model looking straight at the rest of the squad and yet he doesn't do anything. This happens when they were in the water at a pier and when they were under the stairs where a guy in a cowboy hat walked down it blatantly seeing them.
Also the first mission with the snow, you was right up the right easily visible and they walk past like nothing happened. Anyone care to explain this to me please?
Personally I thought that Bad Company 2 had an AMAZING SP. It's a lot better than most SPs that were on earlier battlefields.
MW2s campaign was just.. Meh I didn't really feel a story to it, you just kept doing missions strung together. In Bad Company 2, however, I felt as if it were an actual SP.
I love Bad Company 2s Multiplayer also. It's so realistic and squad oriented. I find it easier for myself to do a lot better on multiplayer when I have a squad rather than playing it by myself.
I'm a bit unsure which SP is better, because BFBC2 had an incredible visibility flaw in it, but MW2 has a twist and bad weapons balance in it (the AA-12 can actually shoot up to 70 yards away: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnrizaO-X00 ) as well as a twist in every mission, sure it kept my heart beating, but it was always doing something different that really stopped becoming CoD. Such as: In the Bog in CoD4 you had to escort a Tank (that pretty much does nothing except one epic part, so y'know), in MW2 a Stryker escorts you where you also have some control over it, and then bomb an AA-field.
But BFBC2's problems are there too, such as the lightning and the shots, they can sneak up on the guard you are about to shoot, right next to him, without being seen. O.o
bfbc2 is by far better. mw2 went too far off the highly successful call of duty franchise type of play. doesnt seem nearly as awesome as the old days of cod3 and mw.
