ok...MW2 defenatlly owns black ops on the multyplayer the weapons on black ops looks kinda retarded and they arent so balanced...i mean u they destroyed the sniping and they made the maps retarded the good thing was just the character costumization.On single played black ops was just awesome.The campaign was just wow.They made better the solo play and they worse the multyplayer...i hope they the next COD game be MW3. But battlefield bad company 2 was a lot more better than these 2
Um in BO i saw a dude kill me. he turned the corner and shot me again. I got to see him kill me twice on that kill cam. spawning is worse, believe it or not. Maps kinda suck, sorry. The Kill streaks also kinda suck. who actually uses those rockets? they are worth nothing, and dogs arent worth it unless it FFA. this last part is pure speculation, but i liked earning things via lots of headshot, or by doing a challenge. feels like you won something, but thats not in BO
Hmmm....MW2 is too horridly imbalanced for my taste, and it lacks my favorite feature of zombies. I find Black Ops to be quite fun, and they are improving the game considerably by patches, such as balancing the 74u, Shotguns canceling out second chance, whoever puts someone into second chance gets the kill, etc. In honesty though, BFBC2 was better than both of them. To be honest the main lure of Black Ops to me is zombies since I am as close to pro as you can get without be officially "Pro"
To be honest the main lure of Black Ops to me is zombies since I am as close to pro as you can get without be officially "Pro"
I hope you mean just wayyyy above average. If not then I hope you don't blame me for not believing you XD
ok...MW2 defenatlly owns black ops on the multyplayer the weapons on black ops looks kinda retarded and they arent so balanced...i mean u they destroyed the sniping and they made the maps retarded the good thing was just the character costumization
Not really a reason.
Only problem I got with Black Ops? Not optimized for PC, low FPS (yes kids, 60 FPS on a PC is low), extremely bad hit registration (which also screws up snipers significantly). Maps? Better. Difficulty to kill someone? Much better. Balanced Weapons? Absolutely....
Black Ops > MW2 And here's why. 1) You don"t have a bunch of wannabe Grizz's quickscoping all the time. 2) The weapons actually have some sort of balance, where in mw2 if you didn't have an AR, you were pretty much screwed. 3) Zombies, nuff said. 4)COD POINTS!!!! 5)MW2 had Hackers by the thousands(especially on pc) 6)no more one man army noob tubers 7) Killstreaks don't build 8) the MW2 maps were to repetitive and boring
FAIL THREAD! Hmm. missing the "good ol mw2 days". i guess you like getting hit by killstreaks every 5 seconds, getting killed by the Scar, or Tar or the ump45, or getting killed by a guy who yells quickscope everytime.. and then when you snipe someone, all you hear in the lobby is "youre a hardscoper blah blah im annoying"
unless youre one of those guys Black ops>mw2 ****.
Ya i agree with theone99 ^^. MW2 was always a match to see who could get a nuke the fastest which completley killed every match and you could knife someone from 5 feet away and get a kill. Black Ops>mw2
Yes it is. Every time I would play the online people would just camp in certain places and just sit there for the whole match until they would die. I see no point in doing such a thing. I like to actually have fun in a game. I care not for a good score.
missing the "good ol mw2 days". i guess you like getting hit by killstreaks every 5 seconds, getting killed by the Scar, or Tar or the ump45, or getting killed by a guy who yells quickscope everytime.. and then when you snipe someone, all you hear in the lobby is "youre a hardscoper blah blah im annoying"
There is a mute button. MW2 is more enjoyable and fun then black ops multiplayer. The map scenario is better. All the weapons are better. And the players are better. On black ops you get the worst players and just campers on every match.