Just because I don't care about a good score doesn't mean I'm bad at the game.
I didn't say that. I am just saying that from my personal experience, what I said is true.
I know it isn't true, I already said - from my experience, the same as you playing on Black Ops and meeting campers.
I don't play for camping in certain spots trying to improve useless stats.
So you agree it is more effective?
I take enjoyment in peoples open-suffering that is mostly due to their own bad personality, and the probability that I can beat them anyway.
But I find that the weapons on MW2 are superior.
Isn't that saying what I was saying?
If it takes less bullets, then it doesn't take as much skill. I remember playing Black Ops when it first came out, I would be in an open space, fighting against 2 people at the same time, I'd be standing with no cover, and I would still be able to pinpoint and kill them both before they killed (but they could severely injure) me.
Never could you find that in Modern Warfare 2. Never. :>
about half hour or so
I barely last a game playing it. I play StarCraft II and even the mods of them are (in my opinion) better quality than some CoD games.
AK-47 or M-16 and just try to kill as many enemies as possible.
Er... Which game?
Doesn't matter tbh, because I often find that knifing (WITHOUT Commando btw) can get me a better score. If I did shoot, it would be with the Ballistic Knife or Sniper
I don't have a video camera to record myself playing a video game. ;P
:P Fair enough.
If you're going to play games, you mays well do it on a PC, really
PC has much more adaptability (being able to use the controller of an Xbox or PS3 is quite the pro) with not just controls but also game genres. RTS games cannot be properly played by an Xbox or PS3 (Because let's be honest, Halo Wars isn't your traditional RTS) and graphics can be enhanced far more.
In that case, if you do play Black Ops then you could put it on Theater.
It's a shame really since my Theaters are mostly near-hit Tomahawks, man... I hate my luck :<
I'm talking about the little tards that hang out in a house or just stay on top of a building.
Houses = Easy to defend.
Top of Buildings = Great strategicly offensive point.
I'm talking about the scene and how the map is made.
Hrmm. It's better done in my opinion. It's more urban which allows more campers, sure, but you just need to be prepared. The bad thing about MW2 is if you camp in a building, and you are a good player then you will choke off that point which would allow your team to virtually ambush the enemy through their own foothold since they have no escape.
Oh wait, my team on MW2 sucks :P
Nar but seriously, camping owns :>
Not as many campers in MW2 as there are in Black ops.
I've nothing against campers but I am sure MW2 players camp more
But, neglecting the whole "Camping" thing, MW2 is still quite terrible with "Overpowered weapons", including:
Spas-12 + Steady Aim (since many maps do have close range)
G18 Dual-wield
ACR / Scar-H (the recoil you suffer when one of those bullets hit you make it powerful enough as is)
UMP45 (I don't think this is overpowered however I find it the most powerful SMG)
Pro-Pipe
Pro-Pipe's do abyssmal damage to a player in Black Ops (I once seen a character with Flak Jacket suffer direct impact + the explosion and survive it, amazingly), making it more of a waste than anything.
I have not witnessed any weapon that is overpowered, please put forth a weapon you think is, because I cannot
Oh and Shotguns do significantly less damage, are more reliant on close-range
and are a main weapon + the maps are evenly done tbh (with exception to a small few like Cracked), allowing good balancing around and evasion of these weapons.
- H