ForumsWEPRRussia or China?

66 8967
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

There has benn many America verse another nation but I just wanted to know , who do you think would have victorie Russia or China ?

  • 66 Replies
russianfreak
offline
russianfreak
1,843 posts
Farmer

what do you mean victory?

jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

Im sorry if the had a WAR.

thelistman
offline
thelistman
1,416 posts
Shepherd

It's illogical that they'd even have a war. So it's an irrelevant issue.

Parsat
offline
Parsat
2,180 posts
Blacksmith

These war questions are pointless. War is not determined by strength alone; it is a complex mix of diplomacy, tactics, and alliance. Without a context, it is impossible to say.

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

If you want an answer to this question then look up statistics as that is the only way you could logically predict the outcome of a conflict. However like Parsat has said so many other factors come into play that it impossible to make an informed descision.

Here are some stats i found off google on this website

http://www.globalfirepower.com/country_detail.asp?country_id=4

China

Military Manpower: 667,657,509
Personnel Fit for Military Service: 550,265,789
Available Yearly Military Manpower: 25,848,582

Purchasing Power: $7,099,000,000,000
Gold Reserves: $1,534,000,000,000

Oil Production: 3,710,000 (barrels/day)
Oil Consumption: 7,000,000 (barrels/day)
Proven Oil Reserves: 16,300,000 (barrels)
Labor Force: 803,300,000
Ports: 8

Airports: 467
Railways: 75,438 km
Waterways: 124,000 km
Roadways: 1,870,661 km
Land Area: 9,596,960 km
Merchant Marines: 1775

To keep the statistics consistent, here are some mmore from the same source website:

http://www.globalfirepower.com/country_detail.asp?country_id=3

Military Manpower: 71,233,475
Personnel Fit for Military Service: 50,105,672
Available Yearly Military Manpower: 2,530,333

Purchasing Power: $2,097,000,000,000
Gold Reserves: $476,400,000,000

Oil Production: 9,677,000 (barrels/day)
Oil Consumption: 2,916,000 (barrels/day)
Proven Oil Reserves: 60,000,000 (barrels)
Labor Force: 72,400,000
Ports: 8

Airports: 1,260
Railways: 87,157 km
Waterways: 96,000 km
Roadways: 871,000 km
Land Area: 17,075,200 km
Merchant Marines: 1130

Hope i could be of some help.

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

oh and btw the second set of statistics are for the Russian military in case you coulnt figure it out.

ChopstickBoB
offline
ChopstickBoB
142 posts
Nomad

Hmmm... Well from those stats it looks like China would murder Russia in a war.

If China invaded Russia... historically countries don't do so well invading Russia. They tend to freeze to death. I'd wager China would take a decent chunck of land before overextending and having to pull out.

Russia wouldn't invade China, but if they did, again they would lose. Lots of military power in a defensive position.

Xzeno
offline
Xzeno
2,301 posts
Nomad

We'll all be speaking Chinese pretty soon anyway. Tell the truth I'm glad Russia is back in the game. China just has too many people. More labor, more brains, more soldiers. All Russia has on it's side is the climate. If they had an armed citizenry, and the Chinese invaded, the Chinese would not stand a chance. As it is, China will destroy them, and everyone else.

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

Th reason countries dont do well invading russia is because of its vastness. The supply lines get far too stretched forcing large armies to withdraw. However things have changed a lot since 1812 and 1942 to the present day. Purely statistically Russia seems to be at a huge disadvantage, but when you consider the number of those people who are completely untrained peasants then the total number of combat effective people would be far smaller. Chinas human wave tactics simply would not work very well against modern technology. I would say the battle for aerial superiority would be vital in this war. China have the worlds largest airforce, but Russia being very well equipped with the latest MiGs, it would be a very close call. Too close really, but i would plump for Russia just on past historical evidence, however as both of these countries have nuclear capabilities then these weapons could be used and it wold be a completely different kind of war.

Parsat
offline
Parsat
2,180 posts
Blacksmith

Purely statistically Russia seems to be at a huge disadvantage, but when you consider the number of those people who are completely untrained peasants then the total number of combat effective people would be far smaller. Chinas human wave tactics simply would not work very well against modern technology.


This is in the past now. Russia doesn't have a peasant army force like they did in WWII, nor does China use human wave attacks anymore.

China have the worlds largest airforce, but Russia being very well equipped with the latest MiGs, it would be a very close call.


China's materiel is not inferior either. Although China has a habit of making copies (a quarter of the world's AK-47 rifles are in fact Chinese copies), their aircraft and weapons are not necessarily more inferior than Russia's.

As I said though, war is heavily context dependent. Who are the generals? What battalions are fighting? What style are they fighting with? Who are their allies? What outside intervention is happening. To think of history as a simple glass sphere enclosing a region across a concrete glass sphere is wrong, wrong, and wrong again.
Parsat
offline
Parsat
2,180 posts
Blacksmith

Oh yeah, China's airforce is actually smaller than that of Russia's and America's.

firefighterpaul
offline
firefighterpaul
33 posts
Nomad

russia would just be communist bitches and china would make toys...

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

This is in the past now. Russia doesn't have a peasant army force like they did in WWII, nor does China use human wave attacks anymore.


Firstly i was talking about China when i was refferring to the peasant army. Secondly China's combat aircraft consist mostly of F 16s and FCK1s which compared to Russia's Su series and their MiGs these are technologically outclassed in every aspect. The Su canard style wings mean they are one of the most manouverable airframes in the world. The MiGs combine the massive top speed of an interceptor aircraft with decent manouverability to create a lethal fighter. In addition Russian LRAAMs are far superior to the Chinese variants giving the Russian pilots a huge advantage.

China's materiel is not inferior either. Although China has a habit of making copies (a quarter of the world's AK-47 rifles are in fact Chinese copies), their aircraft and weapons are not necessarily more inferior than Russia's.


As for Chinese weaponry i never claimed that it was inferior to the Russianss, however when you look at an army of half a billion people it is unrealistic and downright ignorant to say they will all be well trained, well supplied and welll equipped.

As I said though, war is heavily context dependent. Who are the generals? What battalions are fighting? What style are they fighting with? Who are their allies? What outside intervention is happening. To think of history as a simple glass sphere enclosing a region across a concrete glass sphere is wrong, wrong, and wrong again.


I never claimed that what i said was gospel, i was only interpreting the statistics and relavent historical evidence to make an educated prediction of what could potentially happen. I see your point that it is heavily context dependent, however you cannot completely ignore the military history of these nations when making an informed descision.
Communist
offline
Communist
522 posts
Nomad

Then agian Soviet Russia won world war II with vast numbers of of troops who were tossed a rifle and told to defend their country.
In Stalingrad some units had no rifles, they had to pick them off of the dead bodies of their fallen comrades.

China, I think, could counter Russia's vastness with its huge advantage in manpower.

firefighterpaul
offline
firefighterpaul
33 posts
Nomad




Flag


Then agian Soviet Russia won world war II with vast numbers of of troops who were tossed a rifle and told to defend their country.
In Stalingrad some units had no rifles, they had to pick them off of the dead bodies of their fallen comrades.

China, I think, could counter Russia's vastness with its huge advantage in manpower.


wtf soviet union isnt russia
Showing 1-15 of 66