ForumsWEPRRussia or China?

66 8970
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

There has benn many America verse another nation but I just wanted to know , who do you think would have victorie Russia or China ?

  • 66 Replies
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

That what we are, a war orented animal.


It seems like your saying that in a matter that you dont like war. Arn't you human?
crazjayz
offline
crazjayz
243 posts
Nomad

I highly doubt if Russia and China went to war, it would be a land battle. Sure, missiles will be flying around and stuff, but there are too many factors to consider. Personally, I've already mentioned that if it was STRICTLY Russia v. China (as in no one else is going to help/participate), China would win as Russia can't afford anything close to a war.

Itachi2641747
offline
Itachi2641747
264 posts
Nomad

First is you like war, you are an infantile, moronic creature.

As for how much It would cost. No one cares about money if they have a nation on the line, and Russia dosen't have to start it. Land war? Maybe, but in the end, if up against a wall, it could mean total annilation of those groups. We currently, along with the rest of the world, won't launch because we know that will be met with a similar recation. Again, a land war is improbable on a high scale, because it would involve the countries in between, and that would make it a war involving more than just China and Russia.

Communist
offline
Communist
522 posts
Nomad

Again, a land war is improbable on a high scale, because it would involve the countries in between, and that would make it a war involving more than just China and Russia.

I concur, the Mongols and Kazakhstan are right in between Russia and China. China would have a difficult time trying to squeez it's large armies through the narrow passage to the east of Mongolia, which is the only large connection between Russia and China. And if Russia were to attack into china's northern-most province, they would most likely be haulted by China's enormouse population, resulting in a stalemate.
opentotruth
offline
opentotruth
472 posts
Peasant

china very easily. with cyberwarfare being a first target

Mac_MK
offline
Mac_MK
752 posts
Nomad

Russia will win because they don't need army they have over 10,000 nuclear warheads and China has about 80 nuclear warheads

Russia has another advantage they have anti nuclear bombs/warheads and China doesn't

so yea Russia can win you don't need stats like on page 1 that were posted because they are useless when you have nuclear power

Sucal
offline
Sucal
28 posts
Nomad

Russia or China will not be useing Nukes. cus it would violate various articles of international law, including the Geneva Conventions, the Hague Conventions, the UN Charter, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
I'm not saing that thay can't use thim but it will be stuped move if thay did.

also Russia and China are 2 out of 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council. so the likely huond will be vary small. but this is a what if argument.

also China don't have 80 nukes that have 160-400 nukes
and Russia has 5,200 / 8,800 nukes.

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

Russia or China will not be useing Nukes. cus it would violate various articles of international law, including the Geneva Conventions, the Hague Conventions, the UN Charter, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.


All these various treaties didnt exactly stop China from its brutal invasion and occupation of Tibet or Russia's equivalent in Georgia and Cechnya. If they were serious about nuking each other i doubt human rights would hold them back, especially if they were already at war.
Itachi2641747
offline
Itachi2641747
264 posts
Nomad

I must agree with woody, a simple paper won't stop a bomb. Plain and simple.

Naruto
offline
Naruto
658 posts
Nomad

i going to have to say china probably

Sucal
offline
Sucal
28 posts
Nomad

All these various treaties didnt exactly stop China from its brutal invasion and occupation of Tibet or Russia's equivalent in Georgia and Cechnya. If they were serious about nuking each other i doubt human rights would hold them back, especially if they were already at war.


true but those Conflicts can make a world war and maybe a nuclear world war. But that can be easily avoided but If Russia and China are in a war and it git to a Nuclear war
thin that become a World war not just a non-Nuclear world war but a Nuclear world war and that may end all life. why will it be a world war cus that will force UN to step in. UN may try to make them talk to each other but tell me will you try talking to the country that just kill 1000s of your people? or will you try to git pay back? so if UN can't git them to stop thin thay use force and wind that happen it WW and what will stop Russia or China form using there Nukes on us? ohh and that may try to Nuke or bomb(non-Nuke) UN HQ and that is in New York,USA and wind that happens US will go to war along with NATO and that will be the start of the WW3, that all ready use a nuke so what going to stop them from using a nuke on us? and will make the WW3 to a nuclear-WW3.
kell84
offline
kell84
241 posts
Nomad

I would say China would win.

They have a lot of people.

silentclore
offline
silentclore
297 posts
Nomad

China they have better food. Heh plus they gots da martial arts baby

Mac_MK
offline
Mac_MK
752 posts
Nomad

I would say China would win.

They have a lot of people.


people don't matter you can kill them all with nuclear bombs so easily

China they have better food. Heh plus they gots da martial arts baby


this is not the food section or the martial arts
Zyko
offline
Zyko
17 posts
Nomad

Mac_MK, you're right. Many people say that China has a lot of people, but the modern war cannot be won by big armies.

What will army of 20 million people do in field? It will be destroyed in 10 minutes with Ñissiles.

Showing 46-60 of 66